<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Loss Prevention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lp2008.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lp2008.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>News &#38; Opinions from The Nations Capitol</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:00:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on e-Crime Case solved by Paul Jones</title>
		<link>http://lp2008.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/e-crime-case-solved/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lp2008.wordpress.com/?p=145#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Emily,

Thank you for your comment.  I think declaring the case solved is probably ok.  Traditionally the case is referred to as solved when the police have enough crime to make the arrest.  


I think the larger point is there remains a difference between solved from police definition and a conviction in criminal court.  

Based on your point, my future post will probably use a different choice of words.

Warm regards,

Paul Jones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emily,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment.  I think declaring the case solved is probably ok.  Traditionally the case is referred to as solved when the police have enough crime to make the arrest.  </p>
<p>I think the larger point is there remains a difference between solved from police definition and a conviction in criminal court.  </p>
<p>Based on your point, my future post will probably use a different choice of words.</p>
<p>Warm regards,</p>
<p>Paul Jones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on e-Crime Case solved by Emily henrich</title>
		<link>http://lp2008.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/e-crime-case-solved/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily henrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lp2008.wordpress.com/?p=145#comment-42</guid>
		<description>i was just wondering if you can call this solved? according to what i have heard in the news he hasnt gone to trial</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was just wondering if you can call this solved? according to what i have heard in the news he hasnt gone to trial</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Michael J. Schultz</title>
		<link>http://lp2008.wordpress.com/about/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael J. Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Dear Paul,

Thanks for accepting my LinkedIn request.  You have, and continue to do, impressive work on Loss Prevention.  I especially like the fact you alert retailers to the possibility of being inadvertent fencers of stolen goods.

We have a great P2P product that validates both parties without giving up private data that you might be interested in learning about.  Let me know if you would like to learn more.

You can also visit http://check-mates.com to see a demo of the product.


best regards,
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Paul,</p>
<p>Thanks for accepting my LinkedIn request.  You have, and continue to do, impressive work on Loss Prevention.  I especially like the fact you alert retailers to the possibility of being inadvertent fencers of stolen goods.</p>
<p>We have a great P2P product that validates both parties without giving up private data that you might be interested in learning about.  Let me know if you would like to learn more.</p>
<p>You can also visit <a href="http://check-mates.com" rel="nofollow">http://check-mates.com</a> to see a demo of the product.</p>
<p>best regards,<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LP Under 30- Thoughts- Joke by Maggie Newton</title>
		<link>http://lp2008.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/lp-under-30-thoughts-joke/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lp2008.wordpress.com/?p=122#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Absolutley! I caught more shoplifters as a detective in 96&#039; with binoculars and a cat walk..Good times :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutley! I caught more shoplifters as a detective in 96&#8242; with binoculars and a cat walk..Good times <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LP Under 30- Thoughts- Joke by Alan Bishop</title>
		<link>http://lp2008.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/lp-under-30-thoughts-joke/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lp2008.wordpress.com/?p=122#comment-38</guid>
		<description>This was a good post, and very true. As a now 45 year old field guy, I can remember when 4-5 talented, &quot;Floor walking&quot; detectives would grab 80 shoplifters a week, with no cameras at all!!! I also recall supervising newer, (less then 30 year old) detectives that had 100 cameras, two way radios, lookouts, coops, two way mirrors and other tools and a dozen detectives could not grab 80 shoplifters a week........so which technology was better???? I think the old timers had to work harder and get more creative to make the same cases that CCTV give up today!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a good post, and very true. As a now 45 year old field guy, I can remember when 4-5 talented, &#8220;Floor walking&#8221; detectives would grab 80 shoplifters a week, with no cameras at all!!! I also recall supervising newer, (less then 30 year old) detectives that had 100 cameras, two way radios, lookouts, coops, two way mirrors and other tools and a dozen detectives could not grab 80 shoplifters a week&#8230;&#8230;..so which technology was better???? I think the old timers had to work harder and get more creative to make the same cases that CCTV give up today!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LP Under 30- Thoughts- Joke by Well Over 30</title>
		<link>http://lp2008.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/lp-under-30-thoughts-joke/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Well Over 30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lp2008.wordpress.com/?p=122#comment-37</guid>
		<description>My cameras were the size of a mailbox, and my first VCR was reel to reel.  Before that, I had cameras with no recorder. Before that, nothing but coops (as one retail LP prophet proclaimed, &#039;the future of retail loss prevention&#039;).

Color DVRs, with remote access?  I would have thought I&#039;d see flying cars first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My cameras were the size of a mailbox, and my first VCR was reel to reel.  Before that, I had cameras with no recorder. Before that, nothing but coops (as one retail LP prophet proclaimed, &#8216;the future of retail loss prevention&#8217;).</p>
<p>Color DVRs, with remote access?  I would have thought I&#8217;d see flying cars first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fire The Jerk Now&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-  Happy Friday by TOM NELSON</title>
		<link>http://lp2008.wordpress.com/2009/08/08/fire-the-jerk-now-happy-friday/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>TOM NELSON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 18:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lp2008.wordpress.com/?p=107#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Most of what we are experiencing is greed and ego in our government at all levels.  I believe a word of wisdome from one of our forfathers is appropriate.  Since I am an active boyscout leader for 35 years and an outdoorsman this quote really hits home.

We have rights, as individuals, to give as much of our own money as we please to charity; but as members of Congress we have no right to appropriate a dollar of public money. Davey Crockett American Congressman &amp; Outdoorsman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of what we are experiencing is greed and ego in our government at all levels.  I believe a word of wisdome from one of our forfathers is appropriate.  Since I am an active boyscout leader for 35 years and an outdoorsman this quote really hits home.</p>
<p>We have rights, as individuals, to give as much of our own money as we please to charity; but as members of Congress we have no right to appropriate a dollar of public money. Davey Crockett American Congressman &amp; Outdoorsman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pay it Forward by TOM NELSON</title>
		<link>http://lp2008.wordpress.com/2009/07/22/pay-it-forward/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>TOM NELSON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 18:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lp2008.wordpress.com/?p=104#comment-34</guid>
		<description>PAUL,  THANK YOU FOR MAKING A VERY VALID POINT THAT I HAVE PREVIOUSLY PASSED ON TO FRIENDS IN OUR INDUSTRY.  SALES ARE DOWN, PROFITS ARE DOWN, MARGINS ARE SHRINKING AND MANY VERY GOOD LP PROFESSIONALS ARE OUT OF WORK.  THE SKILL SET A GOOD LP PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPS IS TRANSPORTABLE BOTH INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF LP.  WE ALL NEED TO HELP OUR NEXT GENERATION GROW. AS WE ALL KNOW MOST JOBS ARE BETTER FOUND BY WORD OF MOUTH AND CONTACT DIRECT WITH AN INDIVIDUAL BEFORE IT HITS THE JOB BOARDS AND WEB SITES.  I HAVE BEEN IN PAUL&#039;S SHOES TWICE IT IS NOT FUN, YOU FEEL DEPRESSED, REJECTED, AND BEAT YOURSELF UP FOR WHAT &quot;YOU DID WRONG&quot; , WHEN IN MANY CASES IT IS JUST A BOTTOM LINE DECISION AND WE HAVE TO LEARN TO WORK WITH SMALLER STAFFS AND DO MORE WORK.  THE BIGGEST THING I LEARNED WAS WHO WAS YOUR FRIEND AND WHO STOPPED CALLING.  NO OFFENSE TO MY VENDOR FRIENDS, BUT MANY STOP CALLING BECAUSE YOU DONT HAVE BUYING POWER ANY LONGER......BUT SOMEDAY YOU WILL AGAIN.....AND THAT IS WHEN YOU SHOULD REMEMBER YOUR FRIENDS.  LP ON BOTH SIDES OF THE DESK IS A CLOSE KNIT COMMUNITY AND WE ALL NEED TO HELP EACH OTHER .
JUST ONE MAN&#039;S OPINION.  TIMES ARE TOUGH LETS ALL CHIP IN AND TRY TO HELP OUT THOSE OF US WHO ARE UNFORTUNATELY OUT OF WORK.    REGARDS TO ALL,  TOM NELSON</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PAUL,  THANK YOU FOR MAKING A VERY VALID POINT THAT I HAVE PREVIOUSLY PASSED ON TO FRIENDS IN OUR INDUSTRY.  SALES ARE DOWN, PROFITS ARE DOWN, MARGINS ARE SHRINKING AND MANY VERY GOOD LP PROFESSIONALS ARE OUT OF WORK.  THE SKILL SET A GOOD LP PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPS IS TRANSPORTABLE BOTH INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF LP.  WE ALL NEED TO HELP OUR NEXT GENERATION GROW. AS WE ALL KNOW MOST JOBS ARE BETTER FOUND BY WORD OF MOUTH AND CONTACT DIRECT WITH AN INDIVIDUAL BEFORE IT HITS THE JOB BOARDS AND WEB SITES.  I HAVE BEEN IN PAUL&#8217;S SHOES TWICE IT IS NOT FUN, YOU FEEL DEPRESSED, REJECTED, AND BEAT YOURSELF UP FOR WHAT &#8220;YOU DID WRONG&#8221; , WHEN IN MANY CASES IT IS JUST A BOTTOM LINE DECISION AND WE HAVE TO LEARN TO WORK WITH SMALLER STAFFS AND DO MORE WORK.  THE BIGGEST THING I LEARNED WAS WHO WAS YOUR FRIEND AND WHO STOPPED CALLING.  NO OFFENSE TO MY VENDOR FRIENDS, BUT MANY STOP CALLING BECAUSE YOU DONT HAVE BUYING POWER ANY LONGER&#8230;&#8230;BUT SOMEDAY YOU WILL AGAIN&#8230;..AND THAT IS WHEN YOU SHOULD REMEMBER YOUR FRIENDS.  LP ON BOTH SIDES OF THE DESK IS A CLOSE KNIT COMMUNITY AND WE ALL NEED TO HELP EACH OTHER .<br />
JUST ONE MAN&#8217;S OPINION.  TIMES ARE TOUGH LETS ALL CHIP IN AND TRY TO HELP OUT THOSE OF US WHO ARE UNFORTUNATELY OUT OF WORK.    REGARDS TO ALL,  TOM NELSON</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Do I fix my Boss!!! by Loves Leisure</title>
		<link>http://lp2008.wordpress.com/2009/07/17/how-do-i-fix-my-boss/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Loves Leisure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lp2008.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Thanks Paul - This is great!  I am a huge fan of Len Schlesinger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Paul &#8211; This is great!  I am a huge fan of Len Schlesinger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pay it Forward by Steve</title>
		<link>http://lp2008.wordpress.com/2009/07/22/pay-it-forward/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lp2008.wordpress.com/?p=104#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Nice note Paul.  Feel free to direct folks my way if they&#039;d like some coaching.  I&#039;m also doing outplacement/transition work with two colleagues - Joe Eastman Associates.  We break the rule about being able to get only two out of better, faster, cheaper.  We deliver on all of those at the same time.

Cheers,
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice note Paul.  Feel free to direct folks my way if they&#8217;d like some coaching.  I&#8217;m also doing outplacement/transition work with two colleagues &#8211; Joe Eastman Associates.  We break the rule about being able to get only two out of better, faster, cheaper.  We deliver on all of those at the same time.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
